Skip to toolbar
  • Log in
  • Register
PIELink
Register Login
Skip to content
  • Home
    • Homepage
      • About this website
      • Contact
    • Preamble
    • A single framework
      • From PIEs 1 to PIEs 2.0
      • Theory and Practice
      • Getting specific
      • PIEs R&D (and E)
    • ‘A little bit PIE’?
    • A lived experience view of PIEs
    • The Inner Game of PIE
    • The Library
  • PIEs 2 – the basics
    • PIEs 1
    • Psychological Awareness 101
    • Staff training and support 101
    • Learning and Enquiry 101
    • Rules, roles and responsiveness 101
    • Spaces of opportunity 101
    • Relationships
    • Reflective practice
  • PIEs in practice
    • Introducing the PIE approach
    • Case studies and practice examples
      • PIEs and community
      • Built environment and adaptations
      • Using the whole environment (1)
      • Using the whole environment (2)
      • Clubhouses, cores and campus models
      • PIEs in therapeutic settings
      • ‘PIEs Plus’
      • PIEs and ‘psychologically informed business environments’
    • Needs
      • Diversity
      • Domestic violence
      • Ex-military
      • Rough sleeping
      • Seniors and other long term support needs
      • Working with trauma
    • Whole systems as PIEs
      • A PIE of pathways
      • Commissioning
      • Gaps and barriers
      • Navigators and ‘system brokers’
      • Outreach, in-reach, and pathways
    • Settings
      • Approaches
      • Enabling environments
      • ‘Greencare’
      • “Housing First” & PIEs
        • Oil and water? Housing First and enhanced hostel support via PIEs
        • Housing First and PIEs in the US and the UK
        • PIEs, ‘Scattered site’ and ‘networked’ housing
      • Outreach, in-reach, and pathways
      • ‘PIEs Plus’
      • Pretreatment
      • Psychiatric care environments
      • ‘Recovery housing’ in the US and the UK
      • Trauma-Informed Care
    • UK and beyond
      • Cross-cultural dialogues on homelessness
      • Transatlantic Exchange
      • American PIE
      • PIEs in Europe
        • PIEs in Europe: France
        • Housing First in Finland
  • Forums & Groups
    • Special Interest groups
      • Roll out and embedding – SIG
      • Housing First and PIEs – SIG
      • PIEs ‘RD+E’ – SIG
        • Reasons to be careful, Pt 3
    • PIElink forums
      • An ‘Editorial Board’ for the PIElink?
      • Beyond Outcomes – a discussion with Joy MacKeith
        • The language of the Outcome Star
      • Exploring the PIE Abacus – for PIE leads
      • Psychologically informed boundary setting
      • “Pre-treatment in Action”
      • Finding the words – the language that works
        • PIEs 2 – a language of services?
      • Trauma-informed design
      • PIEs in youth services
    • Season Five is different
    • Discussions
      • Asking questions
        • Can short term services work as PIES?
        • “Complex needs?”
        • Is it a philosophy?
        • Is the PIE evolving? (Summary)
        • PIEs 2.0 – the development process
        • My cat is a built environment?
        • PIE accreditation?
        • What psychology?
        • A two way trade
        • Challenges
        • PIE sceptics
        • Social work, psychology and values-based practice
        • The ethics and politics of PIEs
      • Can smarter commissioning help to encourage PIEs?
      • PIEs assessment
        • PIEs R&D (and E)
    • On evaluation
      • PIEs and ‘exclusion-informed research’
      • Approaches to evaluation
      • Evaluation by outcomes
      • Evaluations of specific interventions
      • Whole systems evaluation
  • Pizazz
    • The Pizazz – the paperwork
    • The Pizazz : what is it NOT?
    • The Pizazz approach to assessment
      • Where do you want to go?
      • The coffee break Pizazz
      • Peer review: the final stages
    • Using PIEs 1 with Pizazz
    • PIEs and the Pizazz as a research tool
    • Why is it called ‘Pizazz’?
    • How come its free?
      • Pizazz costs and PIElink income
  • The PIE Abacus
    • Pizazz and the PIE Abacus
      • Getting started with an Abacus customer account
        • PIE Abacus licence costs
          • PIE Abacus costs – larger agencies
          • PIE Abacus costs – small agencies
          • PIE Abacus costs – cost sharing
          • PIE Abacus costs – Individual user Abacuses
          • PIE Abacus costs – Individual staff in smaller services
    • What are people saying about the PIE Abacus?
      • The PIE Abacus pilots
    • The PIE Abacus – text and video briefings for PIE leads
      • More resources for PIE leads
    • The PIE Abacus – applications
      • The PIE Abacus for medium- to large agencies
      • Local practice networks and service ecosystems
      • The PIE Abacus for communities of practice
      • The PIE Abacus with small ‘stand alone’ services
      • Service users’ PIE assessments
        • A ‘street language’ for the Pizazz
      • The PIE Abacus with services using PIEs1
      • Customising the PIE Abacus
        • The origins of the PIE Abacus
        • The ‘short form’ and ‘long form’ screens
        • Key features of the PIE Abacus [1] – the ‘short form’
        • Key features of the PIE Abacus [2] – ‘drilling down’
        • Key features of the PIE Abacus [3] : ‘adding in’ fields.
        • Key features of the PIE abacus [4]: using the overlay features
    • PIE and the Abacus as a research tool
    • FAQ: Costs and sustainability
    • Service users’ PIE assessments
    • All PIE Abacus FAQs
      • FAQ: PIE Abacus use and terms of use
      • FAQs: What exactly is an Abacus?
      • FAQ: Why is it called the PIE Abacus?
      • FAQ: typical licence scenarios
      • FAQ: Ambition and modesty
      • FAQ: Building a multi-Abacus structure
      • FAQ: What is a ‘contributor’?
      • FAQ: Why have individuals as ‘contributors’ at all?
      • FAQ: What is meant by a ‘Lead Agency’?
      • FAQ: What do all these other Abacus terms mean?
  • Members Area
    • About Membership
      • Members Directory
      • Members’ survey 2017: conclusions and developments
    • Conversations
    • The Library
      • Keyword Glossary
      • The monthly essay
      • Communications
        • About Broadcasting
        • The Virtual Drop In
        • Featured Broadcasts and Forums
        • News & Events
      • Newsletters archive
        • Work in progress – research
      • Recently added
      • Voices
    • PIE trainers and consultants directory
      • Getting listed as a PIE trainer
      • Becoming an ‘Associate’
    • Feedback and Support
    • Narnia
      • Future Developments
        • PIEs 1, 2 – and 3?
          • Will there be a PIEs 3?
          • ‘PIEs 3’ – in detail
        • Distance travelled: a new PIEs assessment and specification tool
        • Rigidity in services and systems
        • The PIE as a research method
        • PIEs in Australia
      • And now a word for our sponsors
        • Partnerships
        • Is this the future of vocational training?
        • Is this the future of academic publishing?
        • Plan B company structures, shareholders and an advisory editorial board
        • The homelessness sector as potential beneficiaries
        • Chrissie’s drafting pages
      • The ‘Big Five’
        • Psychological awareness in action
        • What training? and what support?
        • Learning through enquiry
        • Making space
        • The Three Rs

PIELink

personality disorder

June 22, 2015 by Jamie Baker

See also ‘complex trauma’

Post navigation

← local catchment area complex trauma →

Login to PIELink

Register

Quick Links

  • About this website
  • What’s the Big Idea?
  • Voices

Members Area

  • Members Directory
  • The Library

Search The PIELink

Follow the PIElink

Email - editor@pielink.net

Copyright © 2022 PIELink  ·  Website built & maintained by Dark White

WordPress Download Manager

WordPress Download Manager - Best Download Management Plugin

@

Not recently active