Skip to toolbar
  • Log in
  • Register
PIELink
Register Login
Skip to content
  • Home
    • Homepage
    • Preamble
    • About this website
      • Contact
  • PIEs 2 – the basics
    • A single framework
      • From PIEs 1 to PIEs 2.0
      • A lived experience view of PIEs
      • The Inner Game of PIE
      • Relationships
      • Reflective practice
      • PIEs 1
      • PIEs 1, 2 – and 3?
    • Psychological Awareness 101
    • Staff training and support 101
    • Learning and Enquiry 101
    • Spaces of opportunity 101
    • Rules, roles and responsiveness 101
  • PIEs in practice
    • Theory and Practice
    • Getting specific
    • Case studies and practice examples
      • Introducing the PIE approach
      • Built environment and adaptations
      • Using the whole environment (1)
      • Using the whole environment (2)
      • Clubhouses, cores and campus models
      • Outreach and pathways
      • PIEs and community
      • PIEs in therapeutic settings
        • ‘PIEs Plus’
      • PIEs and ‘psychologically informed business environments’
      • Whole systems
    • Needs
      • Diversity
      • Domestic violence
      • Ex-military
      • Gaps and barriers
      • Rough sleeping
      • Service users’ PIE assessments
      • Working with trauma
    • Settings
      • Enabling environments
      • ‘Greencare’
      • Outreach and pathways
      • ‘PIEs Plus’
      • PIEs, ‘Scattered site’ and ‘networked’ housing
      • ‘Recovery housing’ in the US and the UK
    • Approaches
      • Commissioning
      • Enabling environments
      • “Housing First” & PIEs
        • Oil and water? Housing First and enhanced hostel support via PIEs
        • Housing First and PIEs in the US and the UK
      • “Pre-treatment”
      • Navigators and ‘system brokers’
      • Trauma-Informed Care
  • Discussions
    • Forums
      • Psychologically informed boundary setting
      • Top-to-toe PIE embedding
      • PIEs, Housing First and community integration
      • Finding the words – the language that works
        • PIEs 2 – a language of services?
      • Trauma-informed design
      • PIEs and research
        • PIEs and the Pizazz as a research tool
        • PIE and the Abacus as a research tool
        • PIEs and ‘exclusion-informed research’
      • Exploring the PIE Abacus – for PIE leads
    • Questions
      • Can smarter commissioning help to encourage PIEs?
      • Can short term services work as PIES?
      • “Complex needs?”
      • Is it a philosophy?
      • Is the PIE evolving? (Summary)
      • PIEs 2.0 – the development process
      • My cat is a built environment?
      • Partially PIE’d?
      • PIE accreditation?
      • What psychology?
    • Discussions
      • A two way trade
      • A PIE of pathways
      • Challenges
      • PIE sceptics
      • Social work, psychology and values-based practice
      • The ethics and politics of PIEs
    • UK and beyond
      • Cross-cultural dialogues on homelessness
      • Transatlantic Exchange
      • American PIE
      • PIEs in Europe
        • PIEs in Europe: France
        • Housing First in Finland
  • Pizazz and the PIE Abacus
    • PIEs assessment
    • On evaluation
      • Approaches to evaluation
      • Evaluation by outcomes
      • Evaluations of specific interventions
      • Whole systems evaluation
    • The Pizazz on paper or on screen
      • The Pizazz : what is it NOT?
      • The Pizazz approach to assessment
      • The Pizazz – the paperwork
      • Where do you want to go?
      • The coffee break Pizazz
      • Peer review: the final stages
      • Using PIEs 1 with Pizazz
      • Why is it called ‘Pizazz’?
      • How come its free?
        • Pizazz costs and PIElink income
    • The PIE Abacus – an on-line Pizazz
      • The PIE Abacus – text and video briefings for PIE leads
        • More resources for PIE leads
      • Getting started with an Abacus customer account
        • PIE Abacus licence costs
          • PIE Abacus costs – larger agencies
          • PIE Abacus costs – small agencies
          • PIE Abacus costs – cost sharing
          • PIE Abacus costs – Individual user Abacuses
          • PIE Abacus costs – Individual staff in smaller services
      • What are people saying about the PIE Abacus?
        • The PIE Abacus pilots
      • FAQ: PIE Abacus use and terms of use
      • FAQ: Costs and sustainability
      • The PIE Abacus – applications
        • The PIE Abacus for medium- to large agencies
        • Local practice networks and service ecosystems
        • The PIE Abacus for communities of practice
        • The PIE Abacus with small ‘stand alone’ services
        • Service users’ PIE assessments
          • A ‘street language’ for the Pizazz
        • The PIE Abacus with services using PIEs1
        • Customising the PIE Abacus
          • The origins of the PIE Abacus
          • The ‘short form’ and ‘long form’ screens
          • Key features of the PIE Abacus [1] – the ‘short form’
          • Key features of the PIE Abacus [2] – ‘drilling down’
          • Key features of the PIE Abacus [3] : ‘adding in’ fields.
          • Key features of the PIE abacus [4]: using the overlay features
      • All PIE Abacus FAQs
        • FAQs: What exactly is an Abacus?
        • FAQ: Why is it called the PIE Abacus?
        • FAQ: typical licence scenarios
        • FAQ: Ambition and modesty
        • FAQ: Building a multi-Abacus structure
        • FAQ: What is a ‘contributor’?
        • FAQ: Why have individuals as ‘contributors’ at all?
        • FAQ: What is meant by a ‘Lead Agency’?
        • FAQ: What do all these other Abacus terms mean?
  • The Library
    • The Library
      • Keyword Glossary
      • The monthly essay
      • Communications
        • About Broadcasting
        • The Virtual Drop In
        • Featured Broadcasts and Forums
        • News & Events
      • Newsletters archive
        • Work in progress – research
      • Recently added
      • Voices
  • Members Area
    • About Membership
      • Members Directory
      • Members’ survey 2017: conclusions and developments
    • PIE trainers and consultants directory
      • Getting listed as a PIE trainer
      • Becoming an ‘Associate’
    • Feedback and Support
    • Narnia
      • Future Developments
        • Seniors and other long term support needs
        • Psychiatric care environments
        • Distance travelled: a new PIEs assessment and specification tool
        • Rigidity in services and systems
        • The PIE as a research method
      • And now a word for our sponsors
        • Partnerships
        • Is this the future of vocational training?
        • Is this the future of academic publishing?
        • Company structures, shareholders and an advisory editorial board
        • The homelessness sector as potential beneficiaries
        • Chrissie’s drafting pages
      • Whole systems as PIEs
      • The ‘Big Five’
        • Psychological awareness in action
        • What training? and what support?
        • Learning through enquiry
        • Making space
        • The Three Rs

PIELink

personality disorder

June 22, 2015 by Jamie Baker

See also ‘complex trauma’

Post navigation

← local catchment area complex trauma →

Login to PIELink

Register

Quick Links

  • About this website
  • What’s the Big Idea?
  • Voices

Members Area

  • Members Directory
  • The Library

Search The PIELink

Follow the PIElink

Email - editor@pielink.net

Copyright © 2021 PIELink  ·  Website built & maintained by Dark White

WordPress Download Manager

WordPress Download Manager - Best Download Management Plugin

@

Not recently active