Skip to toolbar
  • Log in
  • Register
PIELink
Register Login
Skip to content
  • Home
    • Homepage
      • About this website
      • Contact
    • START HERE!
    • PIElink community activity over 2024-5
    • Some general advice
    • Navigating
    • The Library
      • PIE publications
      • PIEs from the ground up – an introduction
      • Other writings
  • Five core themes
    • Psychological Awareness 101
      • Empathy/awareness
      • Approaches and techniques*
      • Psychological models
    • Staff training and support 101
    • Learning and Enquiry 101
      • A culture of enquiry*
      • Reflective practice
      • Sector engagement
      • Evidence-generating practice
        • PIEs R&D (and E)
    • The Three Rs 101
      • Rules and procedures*
      • Roles*
      • Responsiveness*
    • Spaces of opportunity 101
      • The built environment
      • Networks and surroundings
      • Pathways, systems and system coherence
    • PIEs One – the original core
  • Developing PIEs
    • Introducing the PIE approach
    • A single framework
      • ‘A little bit PIE’?
    • A lived experience view of PIEs
    • Needs
      • “Complex needs?”
      • Children’s services
      • Diversity
      • Domestic violence
      • Ex-military
      • Rough sleeping
      • Seniors and other long term support needs
      • Substance (ab)use
      • Working with trauma
    • Settings
      • Outreach, pathways, environments without buildings
      • Can short term services work as PIES?
      • PIEs, ‘Scattered site’ and ‘networked’ housing
      • “Housing First” & PIEs
      • Psychiatric care environments
      • ‘Greencare’
    • Approaches
      • Enabling environments
      • ‘PIEs Plus’
      • Pretreatment
        • Pre-treatment in the PIEs framework
      • Sports, arts, activity
      • Faith and values-based work
      • Hope
      • Strengths and appreciation
      • Trauma-Informed Care
      • Whole systems as PIEs
        • A PIE of pathways
        • Commissioning
        • Gaps and barriers
        • Navigators and ‘system brokers’
    • Case studies and practice examples
      • PIEs and community
      • Built environment and adaptations
      • Using the whole environment (1)
      • Using the whole environment (2)
      • Clubhouses, cores and campus models
      • PIEs in therapeutic settings
      • ‘PIEs Plus’
      • PIEs and ‘psychologically informed business environments’
    • Digging Deeper
      • What is an environment?
      • What psychology?
      • The ‘Big Five’
        • Psychological awareness in action
        • What training? and what support?
        • Learning through enquiry
        • Rules, roles, responsiveness
        • Making space
      • From PIEs One to PIEs 2.0
      • Relationships in PIEs 2.0
      • The Inner Game of PIE
      • Beyond the UK
        • American PIE?
          • Cross-cultural dialogues on homelessness
          • ‘Recovery housing’ in the US and the UK
          • Housing and support models in the US and the UK
          • Transatlantic Exchange
        • A language of PIEs in mainland Europe
          • PIEs in Europe: France
          • Housing First in Finland
  • Forums & Groups
    • Groups
    • Special Interest groups
      • Roll out and embedding – SIG
      • Housing First and PIEs – SIG
      • PIEs ‘RD+E’ – SIG
        • Reasons to be careful, Pt 3
    • PIElink forums
      • Season Five is different
      • Beyond Outcomes – a discussion with Joy MacKeith
        • The language of the Outcome Star
      • Exploring the Pizazz and PIE Abacus – for PIE leads
      • Psychologically informed boundary setting
      • “Pre-treatment in Action”
      • Finding the words – the language that works
        • PIEs 2 – a language of services?
      • Trauma-informed design
      • PIEs in youth services
  • Pizazz and the PIE Abacus
    • Pizazz
      • The Pizazz approach to assessment
        • Where do you want to go?
        • The coffee break Pizazz
        • Peer review: the final stages
        • The Pizazz as a research tool
      • The Pizazz : what is it NOT?
      • The Pizazz – the paperwork
      • A ‘street language’ for the Pizazz
      • Using PIEs 1 with Pizazz
      • Why is it called ‘Pizazz’?
      • How come its free?
        • Pizazz costs and PIElink income
    • The PIE Abacus
      • What are people saying about the PIE Abacus?
        • The PIE Abacus pilots
      • Getting started with an Abacus customer account
        • PIE Abacus licence costs
      • The PIE Abacus – text and video briefings for PIE leads
        • More resources for PIE leads
        • The PIE Abacus – applications
          • The PIE Abacus for medium- to large agencies
          • Local practice networks and service ecosystems
          • The PIE Abacus for communities of practice
          • The PIE Abacus with small ‘stand alone’ services
          • Service users’ PIE assessments
          • The PIE Abacus with services using PIEs1
          • Customising the PIE Abacus
            • The origins of the PIE Abacus
            • The ‘short form’ and ‘long form’ screens
            • Key features of the PIE Abacus [1] – the ‘short form’
            • Key features of the PIE Abacus [2] – ‘drilling down’
            • Key features of the PIE Abacus [3] : ‘adding in’ fields.
            • Key features of the PIE abacus [4]: using the overlay features
      • PIE and the Abacus as a research tool
      • A One Bead Abacus
      • FAQ: Costs and sustainability
      • Service users’ PIE assessments
      • All PIE Abacus FAQs
  • Members Area
    • PIE publications
      • PIEs from the ground up – an introduction
    • About Membership
      • Members Directory
        • Members’ survey 2017: conclusions and developments
    • The Library
      • Keyword Glossary
      • Communications
        • About Broadcasting
          • The Virtual Drop In
          • Featured Broadcasts and Forums
          • Newsletters archive
        • News & Events
      • The monthly essay
      • Conversations
      • Recently added
      • Voices
    • Feedback and Support
    • Narnia
      • PIE publications
      • Resources Hub
      • Future Developments
        • Digging deeper still
          • Asking questions
            • Challenges
              • Getting specific
              • Braving the elements
              • My cat is a built environment?
              • PIE sceptics
            • Is it a philosophy?
            • Social work, social inclusion and values-based practice
            • Work in progress – research
          • The ethics and politics of PIEs
          • Where did it all come from?
          • Will there be a PIEs 3?
            • PIEs 1, 2 – and 3?
            • ‘PIEs 3’ – in detail
            • Rigidity in services and systems
            • Can smarter commissioning help to encourage PIEs?
          • PIEs R&D (and E)
            • Theory and Practice
            • The PIE as a research method
            • Ethnography as method
            • The public health paradigm in research and practice
            • PIEs and ‘exclusion-informed research’
          • Is the PIE evolving? (Summary)
            • Distance travelled: a new PIEs assessment and specification tool
            • PIEs 2.0 – the development process
            • The lasting legacy of ‘Supporting People’
          • PIEs assessment
            • PIE accreditation?
            • On evaluation
              • Approaches to evaluation
              • Evaluation by outcomes
              • Evaluations of specific interventions
              • Whole systems evaluation
          • Discussions
            • PIE Abacus costs – larger agencies
            • PIE Abacus costs – small agencies
            • PIE Abacus costs – cost sharing
            • PIE Abacus costs – Individual user Abacuses
            • PIE Abacus costs – Individual staff in smaller services
          • A two way trade
          • Housing First and PIEs
          • Housing First and PIEs
            • Is Housing First a PIE approach?
            • Principles and pragmatism in PIEs and HF
            • HF and PIEs – how do they fit?
            • Housing First and PIEs in Europe
            • Oil and water? Housing First and enhanced hostel support via PIEs
            • Pre-treatment in the PIEs framework
        • PIEs in Australia
        • PIE trainers and consultants directory
          • Getting listed as a PIE trainer
          • Becoming an ‘Associate’
      • And now a word for our sponsors
        • The future of PIE & the PIElink
          • An ‘Editorial Board’ for the PIElink?
          • The role of an incubator agency
          • Partnerships
          • Is this the future of vocational training?
          • Is this the future of academic publishing?
          • Company structures and partnerships for significant growth
          • The homelessness sector as potential beneficiaries

PIELink

rules of engagement

12 August 2015 by Jamie Baker

Carefully thought-through ‘rules of engagement’, taking into account users’ psychological and emotional needs, are seen as typical or defining features of a psychologically informed environment. See Keats et al: “Psychologically informed services”; also Johnson: “A handy guide to PIEs” (Video) .

Post navigation

← a PIE of pathways self-actualisation →

Quick Links 1

  • START HERE!
  • What’s the Big Idea?
  • A lived experience view
  • A single framework
  • PIE publications
  • Digging Deeper

Members Area 2

  • Relationships and complex needs
  • Research, development, evaluation, assessment
  • The future of PIE & the PIElink

Copyright © 2024 PIELink

@

Not recently active